Washington, July 15: The US Justice Department Friday asked the Supreme Court to block a judge’s ruling that prevented President Donald Trump’s travel ban from being applied to grandparents of US citizens and refugees already being processed by resettlement agencies.
In a court filing, the administration asked the justices to overturn Thursday’s decision by a US district judge in Hawaii, which limited the scope of the administration’s temporary ban on refugees and travelers from six Muslim-majority countries.
The latest round in the fight over Trump’s March 6 executive order, which he says is needed for national security reasons, came after the Supreme Court intervened last month to partially revive the two bans, which were blocked by lower courts. The Supreme Court said then that the ban could take effect, but that people with a “bona fide relationship” to a US person or entity could not be barred.
The administration had narrowly interpreted that language, saying the ban would apply to grandparents and other family members, prompting the state of Hawaii to ask Hawaii-based US District Judge Derrick Watson to expand the definition of who could be admitted. He ruled for the state late Thursday.
In the court filing, the Justice Department said the judge’s ruling “empties the (Supreme) Court’s decision of meaning, as it encompasses not just “close” family members but virtually all family members. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court is not currently in session but the justices can handle emergency requests. The administration’s application could be directed either to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has responsibility for emergency requests from western states, or to the nine justices as a whole. If the court as a whole is asked to weigh in, five votes are needed to grant such a request.
“The truth here is that the government’s interpretation of the Supreme Court’s stay order defies common sense,” said Omar Jadwat, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union involved in challenging the ban. “That’s what the district court correctly found and the attorney general’s misleading attacks on its decision can’t change that fact.”
In his decision, Watson harshly criticized the government’s definition of close family relations as “the antithesis of common sense.” Watson also ruled that the assurance by a resettlement agency to provide basic services to a newly arrived refugee constitutes an adequate connection to the United States because it is a sufficiently formal and documented agreement that triggers responsibilities and compensation.
In the court filing, the Justice Department said Watson’s ruling on refugees would make the Supreme Court’s decision on that part of the executive order “effectively meaningless.”
915 total views, 6 views today
Bhubaneswar: The ruling Biju Janata Dal (BJD) Sunday alleged that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is delaying the Bijepur by-poll due to pressure from the BJP-led Union government. The Bijepur by-poll has been necessitated by the death of three-time … Continue reading
13,844 total views, 6,952 views today
Bolangir: Bolangir clinched the title of 58th Senior Men’s Inter-District Football Championships for Sahani Cup after scraping past Bhubaneswar 3-2 in a thrilling final here, Sunday. Hosts Bolangir broke the deadlock in the 26th minute through Sourav Ranjan Hanuman. Sourav … Continue reading
14,724 total views, 6,959 views today
London: Grigor Dimitrov stood one win away from the biggest title of his career Saturday after ending his Jack Sock jinx to reach the final of the season-ending ATP Finals at the 02 Arena. The Bulgarian, finally beginning to look … Continue reading
14,756 total views, 6,938 views today
Bhubaneswar: Shilpi Swarupa Das, Anaam Almas and Chinmay Pradhan registered comprehensive victories over their respective opponents in the opening day of the inaugural edition of the Orissa Tennis Premier League (OTPL) here at the Kalinga Stadium, Sunday. Shilpi, playing for … Continue reading
14,830 total views, 6,932 views today