Washington, July 15: The US Justice Department Friday asked the Supreme Court to block a judge’s ruling that prevented President Donald Trump’s travel ban from being applied to grandparents of US citizens and refugees already being processed by resettlement agencies.
In a court filing, the administration asked the justices to overturn Thursday’s decision by a US district judge in Hawaii, which limited the scope of the administration’s temporary ban on refugees and travelers from six Muslim-majority countries.
The latest round in the fight over Trump’s March 6 executive order, which he says is needed for national security reasons, came after the Supreme Court intervened last month to partially revive the two bans, which were blocked by lower courts. The Supreme Court said then that the ban could take effect, but that people with a “bona fide relationship” to a US person or entity could not be barred.
The administration had narrowly interpreted that language, saying the ban would apply to grandparents and other family members, prompting the state of Hawaii to ask Hawaii-based US District Judge Derrick Watson to expand the definition of who could be admitted. He ruled for the state late Thursday.
In the court filing, the Justice Department said the judge’s ruling “empties the (Supreme) Court’s decision of meaning, as it encompasses not just “close” family members but virtually all family members. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court is not currently in session but the justices can handle emergency requests. The administration’s application could be directed either to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has responsibility for emergency requests from western states, or to the nine justices as a whole. If the court as a whole is asked to weigh in, five votes are needed to grant such a request.
“The truth here is that the government’s interpretation of the Supreme Court’s stay order defies common sense,” said Omar Jadwat, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union involved in challenging the ban. “That’s what the district court correctly found and the attorney general’s misleading attacks on its decision can’t change that fact.”
In his decision, Watson harshly criticized the government’s definition of close family relations as “the antithesis of common sense.” Watson also ruled that the assurance by a resettlement agency to provide basic services to a newly arrived refugee constitutes an adequate connection to the United States because it is a sufficiently formal and documented agreement that triggers responsibilities and compensation.
In the court filing, the Justice Department said Watson’s ruling on refugees would make the Supreme Court’s decision on that part of the executive order “effectively meaningless.”
678 total views, 2 views today
Bhubaneswar: A day after rejecting allegations of irregularities in election funding telecast on a national media, the ruling Biju Janata Dal Saturday said it is mulling legal action against those trying to tarnish the party image. “The BJP and a … Continue reading
7,337 total views, 3,031 views today
Jajpur: In a sensational incident, a minor girl was attacked by a man with a knife for rejecting his advances in Jajpur district Saturday. Gourav Ray alias Tapi of Guhali village allegedly attacked the girl after she rejected his advances. … Continue reading
7,415 total views, 3,035 views today
Kakatpur: Some influential people have encroached upon banks of Prachi and Kadua rivers here and set up illegal prawn gherries. The prawn mafia have also created illegal bunds near Keluni mouth at Keutajanga, where Prachi and Kadua rivers join Bay … Continue reading
7,608 total views, 3,013 views today
London: Twelve years when Mithali Raj and Jhulan Goswami played in the final of the ICC Women’s World Cup, nobody was watching them on television. However, this time around when India enter the Lord’s arena here Sunday to face hosts … Continue reading
7,824 total views, 3,005 views today