New Delhi: The Wrestling Federation of India has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court’s order allowing grappler Vinesh Phogat to participate in the selection trials for the Asian Games 2026.
A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe is scheduled to hear the Federation’s plea Friday.
May 22, a division bench of the high court had given its nod to the participation of Phogat in the upcoming trials for the Asian Games, saying the WFI’s selection policy was exclusionary for the lack of discretion to consider an iconic player like her, who is returning from a maternity break.
The high court had ordered that the selection trials, to be held May 30-31, shall be video-recorded by the WFI and an independent observer from the Sports Authority of India (SAI) and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) each shall also remain present.
The appellant (Phogat) shall be permitted to participate in the selection trials for the Asian Games, 2026, which are scheduled for May 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026, it had said.
The high court had said the standard for the selection trials marks a significant deviation from the past practice, which provided for discretion for the selection of iconic players for the Asian Games, and added that the law must ensure that motherhood does not become a ground to exclude female athletes like Phogat.
Motherhood, it had asserted, cannot be treated as a professional impediment or a circumstance warranting adverse treatment.
The high court had further observed that grounds taken by the WFI in the May 9 show-cause notice to Phogat appear to be pre-mediated and reopening the closed issues and that it is necessary that the appellant is permitted to participate in the selection trials in the interest of the sport and justice.
It had also taken exception to the WFI terming Phogat’s disqualification in the 2024 Paris Olympic Games a national embarrassment in the show-cause notice, stating that such a statement was deplorable, ex facie misconceived and ought to have been avoided.
The high court had observed that Phogat’s exclusion from the selection trials was directly attributable to her sabbatical and temporary retirement.
It had passed the order on Phogat’s appeal against a May 18 order of a single-judge bench which had denied her immediate relief on the issue of her participation in the selection trials.
The division bench of the high court had further asked the two independent observers from the SAI and the IOA, to be nominated by the Centre, to submit a report before the single-judge bench.
In her petition before the high court, Phogat has challenged the WFI’s selection policy and circular, which have limited eligibility for participation in the Asian Games trials only to the medal winners of certain tournaments.
Phogat has asserted that the qualification window chosen by the WFI substantially overlapped with her notified sabbatical on account of pregnancy and post-partum recovery, which created a closed and inflexible gate-keeping mechanism that was arbitrary and discriminatory.
Earlier this month, the WFI had declared Phogat ineligible to participate in domestic events till June 26, citing the mandatory six-month notice period linked to athletes returning from retirement under anti-doping rules.
A defiant Phogat, however, showed up at the National Open Ranking Tournament in Uttar Pradesh’s Gonda.
Phogat had participated in a protest staged by women wrestlers in 2023 against alleged sexual harassment by the then WFI president and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
In August 2024, Phogat was disqualified from the 50-kg category Olympic finals for being 100 gm overweight in the morning weigh-in.
