Bharat Jhunjhunwala
Curiously, the government is asking people to boycott Chinese goods; and simultaneously sitting like a lame duck and allowing imports from China. This will not work. We have made a commitment to the effect that we will not impose an average import duty of more than 48.5 per cent, as per our agreement with the World Trade Organisation. Yet, the actual average import duty imposed by us today is only 13.8 per cent. We can triple the import duties within the rules of WTO. But we are not doing this because we want to make available cheap goods to our middle class voters. Of course, an action taken specifically against China will in any case be self-defeating because the same goods will be rerouted through other countries. Therefore, the way to prevent imports from China is to increase import duties on all imports.
Also Read
The matter is connected with foreign investment because trade and investment are two legs of globalization. We have reportedly received $49 billion as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) the last year. A large part of this money is our own capital that has been sent abroad by Indians and brought back in the form of FDI. Let us say, you have earned `5 crore in India. You are required to pay income tax of `1.25 crore on this. You send this money to Mauritius or other tax haven by hawala and convert it into “white” there because those countries have a zero rate of income tax. Then you bring this money back to India as “foreign” money. In this way, you can save a tax of `1.25 crore of less nominal expenditures incurred in the round-tripping.
The second path of our capital going abroad is through transfer pricing by Multi-National Corporations (MNCs). Say, the London-based branch of an MNC sold some goods to its own Mumbai-based branch. The Mumbai branch paid to it at the rate of `12 to the London Branch against the market price of `10. In this way, `2 was transferred “legally” from India to the UK. The international watchdog, Global Financial Integrity, has estimated that $9.8 billion has been “illegally” remitted from India every year through this route. The third pathway is our own Outward FDI. The government has allowed—even encouraged—Indian businesspersons to invest abroad. An amount of $11.3 billion was taken out of India for such outward FDI last year. The true inflow of FDI in India is certainly much less than the claimed $49 billion, if we take these hidden outflows into account. The true inward FDI, in my assessment, is actually hugely negative—and that explains our low and falling rates of growth.
Even more serious are the indications that the outflow of FDI depresses domestic investment. A study done by Al-Sadiq for the International Monetary Fund estimated the relationship between outward FDI and domestic investment for 121 developing countries between 1991 and 2010. It found that a one per cent increase in outward FDI was accompanied with a whopping 29 per cent decline in domestic investment. The outward remittances through hawala, transfer pricing and outward FDI have a huge negative impact on our economy.
Question is this: When our economy is weak, when our growth rate is declining, when our capital is fleeing abroad; when our industries are closing down; when our youth are unemployed; then why we do not increase the import duties and prevent our capital from fleeing abroad as we were doing before 1991? I believe there are two reasons. The first reason is that our big businesspersons like free movement of capital. The Tatas have acquired Jaguar and Mittals have acquired Arcelor because of such freedom. These businesspersons drive the government. These same persons spread the falsehood via the media that we are getting huge amounts of FDI in order to cover up the fact that huge outward flow of our capital is taking place.
The second reason is that our bureaucrats get jobs and fat consultancies from MNCs and the World Bank after their retirement. Their children get the same jobs right now. A former power secretary of the Union Government very proudly informed me around 2010 that he was working as a consultant for the World Bank at a rate of `40,000 per hour. The bureaucrats need to develop favourable relationships with these organisations to keep the pathways for their future benefits open. They implement policies in favour of free trade and free flow of capital for this purpose even though they are destructive for India.
So, there is doublespeak. On the one hand, the government is saying that we will open our economy for cheap imports; and we will allow our capital to flee abroad. On the other hand, the same government is pleading with the common man not to buy goods imported from China. This is like the head of the family placing cigarettes on every table in the house along with a huge billboard, saying, “Smoking is harmful to your health.” The government is making the country weak and asking the people to make it strong! If the government actually wants to save India from Chinese imports, then it will itself have to implement such economic policies which protect India from China. There is no possibility of our separating from China unless we disconnect from the world economy. And we will not disconnect from the world economy because of the self-interests of our own homegrown big businesses and bureaucrats. Thus we should not be surprised that we are strangulated by China in the times to come.
In the end, I would like to say that the present anger against China for allegedly having manufactured and spread the Corona Virus will not hold. Recall that there was a huge disaster in Kedarnath in 2013. Thousands lost their lives. A committee established on the orders of the Supreme Court held that the hydropower projects contributed much to the damage. Today, however, the dominant narrative created by the hydropower companies and the secretaries to the government is that hydropower actually saved the people from the floods. We shall similarly find that, soon the narrative will be changed. It will be said, perhaps, that the Corona Pandemic was a blessing because it led to spread of internet literacy.
The writer is a former Professor of Economics at IIM Bangalore.
