New Delhi: The Supreme Court said Tuesday it would ‘think’ over the submission of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy for an early hearing of his plea seeking e-auctioning of the media rights of cash-rich IPL.
A bench comprising Chief Justice JS Khehar and Justice DY Chandrachud said, “We will think over it when Swamy sought an urgent hearing of his fresh plea.”
The BJP leader referred to the apex court verdicts to buttress his point that it has been held that auctioning is the best method of awarding contracts. He also said that the amount involved in the award of IPL media rights was to the tune of Rs 30,000 crore and the issue should not be decided in an opaque manner.
“This petition prays that the distribution of IPL Rights which is scheduled on July 17, 2017 should be done in the most transparent mode available that is via E-Auction,” the petition said.
It said that all the activities of the BCCI are undertaken with tacit concurrence of the state governments and the Centre ‘who are not only fully aware but supportive of the activities of the Board’.
“It is a requirement that non-discriminatory and transparent method, with the best international practices must be adopted for distribution of the valuable media rights so as to ensure the maximum revenue in the larger national interest,” Swamy’s plea stated.
He alleged that there was a consistent attempt of vested parties to try and build a monopoly by getting the above valuable rights in a non-transparent manner.
“Huge money is involved amounting to Rs 25000–30000 crore in the valuable rights associated with the game of cricket in India, which makes it mandatory to have the auction process robust, completely transparent in order to maximise the revenue and prevent vested interest from making undue gains,” Swamy said.
Referring to Justice RM Lodha committee recommendations, the plea said that the panel made strong comments about the BCCI tender process and the methods previously adopted by cricket administrators of BCCI in granting licenses in relation to media and television rights.
“No standard norms and objective criteria or procedures have been established for the distribution of the valuable rights associated with the game of cricket and selection or engagement of the rights holders. So clear principles of transparency should be laid down,” the plea further stated.
