New Delhi: The BCCI will come under the purview of the National Sports Governance Bill that is set to be introduced in Parliament on Wednesday and will be required to take recognition from the proposed National Sports Board, even though it is not reliant on government funding.
This was revealed by a top Sports Ministry source Tuesday.
“Like all National Sports federations (NSFs), the BCCI will have to comply with the law of the land once this Bill becomes an Act. They don’t take ministry funding, but an Act of Parliament applies to them,” the source said.
“They will remain an autonomous body like all other NSFs, but their disputes, if any, will also come to the proposed National Sports Tribunal, which will become the dispute resolution body for sports matter ranging from elections to selection,” the source added.
“However, this Bill does not mean government control on any NSF. Government will be a facilitator in ensuring good governance, not an enforcer.”
The BCCI has become a part of the Olympic movement after cricket was included in the 2028 Los Angeles Games, where it will be played in the T20 format.
The long-awaited Sports Governance Bill seeks to institutionalise a strong framework for timely elections, administrative accountability, athlete welfare and reduction in litigation through a slew of measures.
The National Sports Board (NSB), appointed entirely by the central government, will have sweeping powers to grant and even suspend recognition of federations based on complaints or “its own motion” for violations ranging from electoral irregularities to financial misappropriation.
The Bill makes some concessions on the thorny issue of age cap of administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies do not object. In electoral matters, the Bill will accept the “supremacy” of the Olympic Charter and the statutes of the International Federations.
The proposed NSB will comprise a chairperson, and its members will be appointed by the central government from “amongst persons of ability, integrity and standing.”
The appointments would be done based on the recommendations of a search-
cum-selection committee, according to the Bill that has been finalised after extensive consultations with stake-holders and public inputs.
The selection committee would be made up of the Cabinet Secretary or Secretary Sports as chairperson, the Director General of the Sports Authority of India, two sports administrators who have each served as the President or Secretary General or Treasurer of a National Sports Body and one eminent sportsperson who is a Dronacharya, or Khel Ratna or Arjuna awardee.
“This is an athlete-centric Bill which will ensure stable administration, fair selection, safe sports and grievance redressal, NSF audits, proper accounting and better fund management,” the ministry source asserted.
“The National Sports Tribunal will ensure that there is no career damage to athletes due to delayed court cases. Even now, 350 different court cases are in progress where the ministry is a party, this needs to end,” he added.
As was mentioned in the draft released last year, the Board will have the power to grant recognition to NSFs and even constitute ad-hoc panels to run individual sports in case an NSF is suspended.
It would also be mandated to “collaborate” with the International Sports Bodies for welfare of athletes in India and to issue guidelines to NSFs for ensuring compliance with international standards.
All these duties have so far been the domain of the IOA, which acted as the nodal body for NSF-related matters.
The Board has been empowered to de-recognise a national body that fails to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed “gross irregularities in the election procedures.”
In addition, failure to publish annual audited accounts or “misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds” would also invite suspension from the NSB but it would be required to consult the concerned global body before proceeding.
The Board was vehemently opposed by the IOA at the consultation stage and was described as government interference that might invite sanctions from the International Olympic Committee (IOC).
However, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya has asserted that the IOC has been duly consulted while drafting the document. A harmonious relationship with the IOC would be crucial to India’s bid to host the 2036 Olympic Games.
“Everyone is on board now. This bill explicitly aligns with the Olympic charter, and even the IOC feels that good work has been done in framing it,” the source said.
The proposed National Sports Tribunal seeks to provide “independent, speedy, effective and cost-efficient disposal of sports-related disputes.”
“A ruling by the Tribunal can only be challenged in the Supreme Court,” the ministry source said.
It will comprise a chairperson and two other members. The head would be a sitting or retired judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court.
The appointments would once again be in the hands of the central government based on recommendations of a committee that will be headed by the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge recommended by the CJI.
The central government will have the power to remove its members in case of violations, including financial irregularities and actions prejudicial to “public interest”.
