Chennai: Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan Saturday launched a sharp attack on Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin over the ongoing row surrounding the three-language policy under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, accusing him of misrepresenting the reform for political gains.
In a strongly worded statement, Pradhan rejected Stalin’s claims of “Hindi imposition”, describing them as a “tired narrative” aimed at masking governance failures. He asserted that the NEP promotes linguistic freedom rather than coercion, emphasising that the policy prioritises education in the mother tongue to ensure better learning outcomes for students.
“The portrayal of NEP as a compulsory Hindi policy is misleading,” Pradhan said, adding that multilingualism should be viewed as an asset rather than a threat. He argued that Tamil language and culture would be strengthened, not weakened, if students were equipped with multiple linguistic skills in an increasingly globalised world.
Highlighting the Centre’s initiatives, Pradhan said the Union government, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has actively promoted Tamil language and heritage through national and international platforms, including events such as the Kashi Tamil Sangamam.
He also pointed to structural reforms under the NEP, including teacher training programmes, institutional strengthening through District Institutes of Education and Training (DIETs), and national frameworks such as the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST) and the National Mission for Mentoring (NMM).
The Union Minister further accused the DMK government of obstructing key educational initiatives in the state. He alleged that Tamil Nadu has stalled the implementation of PM SHRI schools by refusing to sign the required memorandum of understanding, despite earlier commitments.
Pradhan also referred to the issue of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas, stating that despite directions from the Supreme Court, the state government continues to resist their establishment. He said this has deprived underprivileged students of access to quality residential education and modern infrastructure.
Dismissing concerns about resource constraints as a “facade”, Pradhan maintained that the Centre remains committed to funding, teacher training, and institutional development. He accused the state government of prioritising “divisive politics” over educational progress.
Calling for cooperation, Pradhan urged the Tamil Nadu government to move beyond political rhetoric and join what he described as a national mission to empower Indian languages while enhancing educational opportunities for students.
