Reuters
Nice, June 19: When UEFA decided eight years ago to expand the European Championship from 16 to 24 teams, its then president Michel Platini promised the standard of the tournament would not drop.
Two-thirds of the way through the group stage, European soccer’s governing body may feel they have grounds to claim that, on the face of it, Platini was right.
Iceland have held Portugal and Hungary, Albania took France to within minutes of a 0-0 draw, Northern Ireland beat Ukraine and nobody has made fools of themselves. As the old cliche goes, there are no weak teams in football anymore.
But Platini’s argument somewhat misses the point, and could be used to justify an even bigger tournament.
UEFA has 55 members with France, Spain and Germany widely regarded as a cut above the rest, followed by three or four others such as Italy, England and Belgium. Below them are about 30 teams all of a fairly similar standard.
Teams such as Denmark, Netherlands and Greece – all former winners — Serbia, Slovenia, Bosnia, Israel, Cyprus, Belarus, Scotland, Finland, Montenegro and Norway failed to make France but would also no doubt have been able to hold their own if they had qualified.
With so many teams of a similar standard, the question is where to draw the line and many critics still feel 16 was the ideal place. The development of the sport and training methods means that almost any country with a well-structured federation can put on a respectable showing at international level.
UEFA’s problem is that when middle-ranking teams face top sides, they tend to pack their defence and use spoiling tactics. “There are teams playing ultra-defensively. But they do that well. The smaller nations like Albania or Wales are defensively very well schooled. They see their chance in that,” said Germany coach Joachim Loew.
On the other hand, when middle-ranking teams face each other, the approach can resemble a decent English Championship match. A bigger tournament has meant increasing the number of ordinary, undistinguished matches to the point where they almost seem to merge into each other.
But another disadvantage is that, with the 24-team format, the top two teams in each of the six groups go through plus the four best third-placed sides. Not only does this mean teams can quite possibly qualify by drawing three games, it also makes the last group games an exercise in mathematics as much as football.
