Dubai/Karachi: The International Cricket Council’s (ICC) dispute panel Tuesday dismissed Pakistan’s compensation claim against India for allegedly failing to honour a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on bilateral series, ending the long-standing feud by accepting the BCCI’s arguments on the matter.
“…the PCB’s claim is dismissed. Costs are reserved,” the ICC stated in the one-line order that concluded a 26-page judgement. “The judgement is binding and non-appealable,” it added.
The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had demanded `447 crore compensation after alleging that the BCCI didn’t honour the MoU that required India to play six bilateral series between 2015 and 2023. The BCCI, on its part, maintained that the alleged MoU was not binding and did not stand as Pakistan failed to honour a commitment to support the revenue model suggested by India for the ICC.
The Indian Board also said that bilateral cricket with Pakistan was subject to government clearance, which has not been forthcoming since the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.
“We are happy that our stand has been vindicated. What PCB termed as Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was just a proposal letter,” CoA chief Vinod Rai told PTI. “I would like to thank the BCCI legal team as well as everyone who worked on this arbitration,” Rai said. Rai said BCCI will now file a counter compensation case against the PCB to demand the cost of arbitration.
“We will make a presentation to the panel and demand entire cost of compensation to be borne by the PCB for the arbitration where there claims have been dismissed,” he added.
The PCB reacted with disappointment and said it would weigh its options after going through the judgement. “The PCB notes with regret the decision of the Disputes Resolution Committee,” their statement said.
“PCB will determine its future course of action in this regard after detailed deliberations and consultations with its stakeholders,” it added.
The ICC’s three-member dispute resolution committee was formed last year to look into the PCB’s compensation claim. The hearing took place at the world body’s headquarters here from October 1-3. The issue goes back to 2014 when the erstwhile BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel signed a one-page document which BCCI always termed as the ”proposal letter” to play six bilateral series between 2015 and 2023 on home-and-away basis.
The ICC dispute panel ruled that the document signed between the two Boards did not seem binding. “It follows inexorably that the PCB’s claim must fail. If there was no obligation on the BCCI to engage in the tours in either 2014 or 2015, its omission to do so was no breach and gave rise to no damages claim,” it said.
Lawless Law
By Aakar Patel As a democratic society, it is expected that India’s authorities follow the rule of law. This includes...
Read moreDetails
