Washington: Silicon Valley-based IT company ‘Xterra Solutions’ has filed a lawsuit against the US government for denying the most sought-after H-1B visa to a highly qualified Indian professional, terming the renunciation ‘arbitrary’ and a ‘clear abuse of discretion’.
The company alleged in its lawsuit that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) improperly denied H-1B visa to Praharsh Chandra Sai Venkata Anisetty, 28, whom it had hired as a ‘business system analyst’.
The company’s H-1B petition on behalf of Anisetty was denied on the sole ground that the job offered to him did not qualify as an H-1B specialty occupation, the lawsuit said.
“The denial is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, is contrary to established legal precedent, and is arbitrary, capricious and constitutes a clear abuse of discretion,” the company alleged and urged the Northern District of California US District Court to set aside the USCIS order.
The H1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in specialised occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise. The technology companies depend on it to hire tens of thousands of employees each year from countries like India and China.
The most sought-after visa has an annual numerical limit cap of 65,000 visas each fiscal year as mandated by the US Congress. The first 20,000 petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries with a US masters degree or higher are exempt from the cap.
Anisetty holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering (Electronics and Communication Engineering) as well as a Master’s of Science degree in Information Technology and Management from the University of Texas at Dallas. He currently holds valid H-4 dependent status through his wife, the principal beneficiary of an H-1B application.
The company asserted that Anisetty’s current position as a business systems analyst meets one or more of the criteria for an H-1B specialty occupation.
“USCIS’s decision dated February 19, 2019 denying Xterra’s H-1B petition, filed on behalf of Anisetty, was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with the law,” the lawsuit said. It also said that Anisetty’s position as a business analyst met all four criteria for a specialty occupation.
The company alleged that the USCIS acted arbitrarily and capriciously in finding that the current position offered to the Indian professional did not meet criterion that ‘a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position’.
PTI
