press trust of india
New Delhi, Feb 11: The Election Commission of India (ECI) has told the Supreme Court that it has proposed to the Centre to amend the law and bar people accused of offences punishable with at least five years, from contesting elections after charges were framed against them by a court.
In an affidavit filed in the top court, the ECI said that it has actively taken steps to decriminalise politics and also made recommendations, but “any further steps to effectively decriminalise politics would require legislative amendments, which is beyond the scope” of the poll panel.
It said people against whom charges have been framed by a court for offences punishable with at least five years, should be barred from contesting polls if the cases were registered against them at least six months prior to the election.
The matter is listed for hearing Monday before a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra.
The affidavit said that the ECI should be given the power to de-register political parties and be authorised to issue necessary orders regulating registration and deregistration of parties. It said the poll body has been raising the issue of criminalisation of politics since 1998 and had sent proposals to the Centre in this regard July 15, 1998 which were reiterated by it in the recommended electoral reforms of July 2004 and December 2016.
Citing its proposals, the ECI said that people with criminal background and accused of serious offences by contesting elections send very negative signals about the electoral process.
The affidavit was filed on a plea by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay who sought that convicted people should be barred from forming political parties and becoming their office-bearers for the period they were disqualified under the election law.
The poll panel, while referring to the provisions of the Represenation of the People Act, 1951, said that the law did not expressly confer any power on the ECI regarding deregistration of political parties.
It endorsed the demand for inner party democracy terming it as essential but clarified that the legislature would have to carry out “legislative amendments in order to enable and empower the ECI to frame guidelines in relation to inner party democracy”.
The apex court had January 8 asked the Centre and the ECI to consider with “due seriousness” the plea and told them to file their response. The top court had agreed to examine the constitutional validity of section 29A of the 1951 Act dealing with the power of the ECI to register a political party.
The plea has also sought a direction to the ECI to frame guidelines to decriminalise the electoral system and ensure inner party democracy, which was proposed by the NCRWC.
It also claimed that in 2004, the poll panel had proposed an amendment to section 29A of the Act to authorise it to issue apt orders regulating the registration or deregistration of political parties.
123 judges posting proposals pending
New Delhi: Over 120 recommendations by 13 high courts for appointment of judges are pending with the government and the Supreme Court collegium, awaiting a final decision at a time when 403 posts out of a total sanctioned strength of 1,079 are vacant in various high courts. On the flip side, the figures also indicate that the high courts are yet to recommend suitable names for 280 vacancies. Highly-placed sources in the government said that as of February 1, 123 recommendations made by collegiums of 13 high courts were pending with the government as well as the Supreme Court collegium. While 43 names are pending with the Supreme Court collegium, 80 names are with the government.
