New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday directed the Election Commission (EC) to increase the random matching of VVPAT slips with EVMs from one booth per Assembly segment to five in the upcoming Lok Sabha polls for better voter confidence and credibility of electoral process.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi however did not agree to the request of 21 opposition parties leaders that VVPAT slips of 50 per cent EVMs be matched, on the ground that it will require huge manpower and not be feasible in view of infrastructural difficulties. The bench, also comprising Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, disposed of the petition filed by opposition parties including TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu on the issue.
In their response to Election Commission’s affidavit, the leaders of 21 opposition parties have told the apex court that they do not mind a delay of six days in declaration of Lok Sabha election results for counting of 50 per cent of VVPAT slips, saying it is not a “serious delay” if it ensures integrity of the electoral process.
The EC in its affidavit has claimed that the verification of 50 per cent of VVPAT slips would delay the declaration of election results by “5.2 days”. The leaders said it “is not a serious delay in any manner if it ensures integrity of electoral process”. “If delay of 5.2 days is to be balanced with the integrity of electoral process, the balance will certainly tilt towards the latter,” they said in an affidavit submitted to the court.
The commission follows a system of counting of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips in one polling booth per assembly constituency in Vidhan Sabha elections, and one polling booth in each assembly segment for Lok Sabha polls.
Naidu and others seeking that VVPAT slips of at least 50 per cent of voting machines in each assembly constituency be matched with Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) during the counting of results in the general elections, starting April 11.
Protect the Protest
By Aakar Patel There was a remarkable exchange in the Delhi High Court this week. The government was asked why...
Read moreDetails
